Walter v. Introcaso
52 A.2d 676, 135 N.J.L. 461, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 222
This text of 52 A.2d 676 (Walter v. Introcaso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Walter v. Introcaso, 52 A.2d 676, 135 N.J.L. 461, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 222 (N.J. 1947).
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ackerson.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Waohenfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 14.
For reversal — Hehbr, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
WOODMONT PROPERTIES, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF WESTAMPTON (L-2494-18, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2022
Butterworth v. Morgan
22 So. 3d 473 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2008)
PNC Bank v. Axelsson
860 A.2d 1021 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
Estate of Einsiedler v. Commissioner
1994 T.C. Memo. 155 (U.S. Tax Court, 1994)
Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. City of Camden
545 A.2d 127 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1988)
Camp Clearwater, Inc. v. Plock
146 A.2d 527 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Township of Woodbridge v. Pavel
66 A.2d 902 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
52 A.2d 676, 135 N.J.L. 461, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-v-introcaso-nj-1947.