Walter v. Fees
25 A. 829, 155 Pa. 55, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1183
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 16, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 237·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
This was an appeal from the refusal of the court below to open a judgment. In all such cases a wide discretion must necessarily be exercised by the learned judge of the court below. See Jenkintown National Bank’s Appeal, 124 Pa. 337. We find no abuse of this discretion in the present case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walter v. Fees, 25 A. 829, 155 Pa. 55, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1183 (Pa. 1893).
25 A. 829 (Walter v. Fees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
George v. George
178 A. 25 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Orient Building & Loan Ass'n v. Freud
148 A. 841 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Ellis v. Ambler
11 Pa. Super. 406 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Crawford ex rel. Watson v. Rath
4 Pa. Super. 612 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)