Walter v. . Farmer
This text of 1 N.C. 788 (Walter v. . Farmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff showed in his declaration that there was a conversation between him and the defendant about the purchase of a certain quantity of herb for dying, called woad, viz., five loads, at the rate of 6d. for every 14 pounds thereof, and that the defendant, in consideration of 6d. in hand, promised to sell and deliver him the said five loads at the rate aforesaid. On nihil dicit the plaintiff had judgment. Jermyn moved in arrest of judgment: (1) That the declaration is for quinque carucar (anglicecartloads), and caruca does not signify a load, but a quantity of land. (2) It is not shown to what quantity the loads amount to. He ought to have said that the five loads weighed so many pounds, which at 6d. for every 14 pounds amount to so much. Adjournatur.
C. J. Perhaps the plaintiff could not show this, as they were not delivered.
Jermyn. M. 18 Jac. Trover and conversion were de tribus ponderibus, and the plaintiff could not have judgment; for this does not signify a certain weight. I was of counsel in the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.C. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-v-farmer-kingsbench-1793.