Walter v. Fargo
This text of 31 Misc. 769 (Walter v. Fargo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As it appears that the company agreed to carry the case to the destination, if on its line, otherwise to deliver to another carrier on the route to the destination, and that it was not to be liable for loss or damage not occurring on its own road or its portion of . the through route, and as the evidence of the witness Sherwood as to the extent of defendant’s line was competent, the [770]*770judgment must be affirmed with costs. See Reed v. United States Express Co., 48 N. Y. 462.
Present: Tbuax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 Misc. 769, 64 N.Y.S. 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-v-fargo-nyappterm-1900.