Walter v. Breisch
This text of 86 Pa. 457 (Walter v. Breisch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered,
— There was sufficient evidence to show excessive usury intervening between the entry of the original judgment and its revival by amicable agreement. If the amicable revival were conclusive upon the defendant confessing the judgment, usury would seldom be reached. An<l creditors, aware of such law, would always make it a condition of giving time, that a judgment or war[459]*459rant of attorney to confess it, or to waive it, would be given. This corrective power of the court must be exercised to prevent the ruin of unfortunate debtors who are in merciless hands. This case is an apt illustration of the benign effect of-the law against wrong. The defendant in this case for several years paid interest at the rate of thirty-six per cent', per annum, the usury amounting to a larger sum than the original debt.
Order affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 Pa. 457, 1878 Pa. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-v-breisch-pa-1878.