Walter v. Bechtol

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Walter v. Bechtol

5 Rawle 228, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 36

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 16, 1835

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 5 Rawle 228 (Walter v. Bechtol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walter v. Bechtol, 5 Rawle 228, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 36 (Pa. 1835).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The objection to the recognizance is obviated by the fact, that it was in the power of the appellee, to have it amended, and by omitting to rule the appellant to do so, he waived the benefit of bail altogether. The other objections are better founded. The amount of the demand is not so stated as to entitle the party to an appeal; and the costs were not paid within the period allowed to perfect the appeal, of which payment of all the taxed costs is an integral part.

Judgment reversed, and the appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The objection to the recognizance is obviated by the fact, that it was in the power of the appellee, to have it amended, and by omitting to rule the appellant to do so, he waived the benefit of bail altogether. The other objections are better founded. The amount of the demand is not so stated as to entitle the party to an appeal; and the costs were not paid within the period allowed to perfect the appeal, of which payment of all the taxed costs is an integral part.

Judgment reversed, and the appeal quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Rawle 228, 1835 Pa. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-v-bechtol-pa-1835.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack