Walter Transport Corporation v. Palm Beach Metro Transportation, LLC

26 So. 3d 704, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 918, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 295
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 2010·No. 4D08-4842·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Walter Transport Corporation appeals a final order dismissing with prejudice all counts directed to appellees Palm Tran, Inc., and Palm Beach County. On appeal, Walter Transport relies heavily on Technicable Video Systems, Inc. v. Americable of Greater Miami, Ltd., 479 So.2d 810 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), which we deem distinguishable. The contract in that case did not have a provision stating that the intent of the parties was not to benefit third parties. Therefore, that contract had an unrebutted presumption that the parties intended to confer a benefit on the minority business enterprise. Here, in contrast, the main contract made clear that the parties did not intend to benefit any third party, and the subcontract between the County and Walter Transport reaffirmed this intent, thereby rebutting any presumption that the parties to the main contract intended to confer any benefit on Walter Transport.

Affirmed.

GROSS, C.J., WARNER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter Transport Corporation v. Palm Beach Metro Transportation, LLC, 26 So. 3d 704, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 918, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 295 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

26 So. 3d 704 (Walter Transport Corporation v. Palm Beach Metro Transportation, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Technicable Video Sys. v. Americable
479 So. 2d 810 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)