Walter Tateatice Royals v. Dave Williams, Warden, Attorney General of Virginia
This text of 813 F.2d 402 (Walter Tateatice Royals v. Dave Williams, Warden, Attorney General of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
813 F.2d 402
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Walter Tateatice ROYALS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dave Williams, Warden, Attorney General of Virginia,
Defendants-Appellees,
No. 86-6751.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 31, 1986.
Decided Dec. 3, 1986.
Before RUSSELL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Walter Tateatice Royals, Appellant pro se.
Robert Homer Anderson, III, for appellees.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that an appeal from his order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate. Royals v. Williams, C/A No. 86-352-R (E.D.Va. August 26, 1986).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
813 F.2d 402, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34224, 1986 WL 18634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-tateatice-royals-v-dave-williams-warden-att-ca4-1986.