Walter T. Embry, Inc. v. Lasalle National Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walter T. Embry, Inc. v. Lasalle National Bank

868 So. 2d 661, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3738, 2004 WL 574491

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 24, 2004

DocketNo. 4D03-961

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 868 So. 2d 661 (Walter T. Embry, Inc. v. Lasalle National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walter T. Embry, Inc. v. Lasalle National Bank, 868 So. 2d 661, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3738, 2004 WL 574491 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Walter T. Embry, Inc. appealed three orders in this case. As to the dismissal order, we affirm. As to the order striking defenses and the discovery order, this Court is without jurisdiction because the orders are non-final, non-ap-pealable orders. See Broward, County v. G.B.V. Int'l Ltd., 787 So.2d 838, 843 (Fla.2001)(reeognizing that a discovery order is a non-final, non-appealable order); Bernstein v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n of Orlando, 384 So.2d 301, 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)(concluding that an order striking affirmative defenses is not an appeal-able order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130).

AFFIRMED.

POLEN, MAY, JJ., and DAMOORGIAN, DORIAN, K, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Walter T. Embry, Inc. appealed three orders in this case. As to the dismissal order, we affirm. As to the order striking defenses and the discovery order, this Court is without jurisdiction because the orders are non-final, non-ap-pealable orders. See Broward, County v. G.B.V. Int'l Ltd., 787 So.2d 838, 843 (Fla.2001)(reeognizing that a discovery order is a non-final, non-appealable order); Bernstein v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n of Orlando, 384 So.2d 301, 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)(concluding that an order striking affirmative defenses is not an appeal-able order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130).

AFFIRMED.

POLEN, MAY, JJ., and DAMOORGIAN, DORIAN, K, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

868 So. 2d 661, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3738, 2004 WL 574491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-t-embry-inc-v-lasalle-national-bank-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack