Walter T. Embry, Inc. v. Lasalle National Bank

868 So. 2d 661, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3738, 2004 WL 574491
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2004·No. No. 4D03-961·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Walter T. Embry, Inc. appealed three orders in this case. As to the dismissal order, we affirm. As to the order striking defenses and the discovery order, this Court is without jurisdiction because the orders are non-final, non-ap-pealable orders. See Broward, County v. G.B.V. Int'l Ltd., 787 So.2d 838, 843 (Fla.2001)(reeognizing that a discovery order is a non-final, non-appealable order); Bernstein v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n of Orlando, 384 So.2d 301, 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)(concluding that an order striking affirmative defenses is not an appeal-able order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130).

AFFIRMED.

POLEN, MAY, JJ., and DAMOORGIAN, DORIAN, K, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter T. Embry, Inc. v. Lasalle National Bank, 868 So. 2d 661, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3738, 2004 WL 574491 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

868 So. 2d 661 (Walter T. Embry, Inc. v. Lasalle National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dayna Bolera v. John Papa, Royal Palm Medical, Inc.
142 So. 3d 918 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)