Walter Sorto v. Lorie Davis, Director

Fifth Circuit

Walter Sorto v. Lorie Davis, Director

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walter Sorto v. Lorie Davis, Director. Read the opinion of the Court — 859 F.3d 356 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 7, 2018·No. 16-70005·Published

Opinion

Case: 16-70005 Document: 00514339791 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/07/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-70005

WALTER ALEXANDER SORTO,

Petitioner–Appellant,

v.

LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent–Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Treating Respondent–Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The prior opinion, Sorto v. Davis, 859 F.3d 356 (5th Cir. 2017), is withdrawn, and a revised opinion will be forthcoming.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case: 16-70005 Document: 00514339791 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/07/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-70005

WALTER ALEXANDER SORTO,

Petitioner–Appellant,

v.

LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent–Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Treating Respondent–Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The prior opinion, Sorto v. Davis, 859 F.3d 356 (5th Cir. 2017), is withdrawn, and a revised opinion will be forthcoming.

Walter Sorto v. Lorie Davis, Director, (5th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Walter Sorto v. Lorie Davis, Director (Walter Sorto v. Lorie Davis, Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related