Walter S. Spivey v. State
This text of Walter S. Spivey v. State (Walter S. Spivey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00830-CR
Walter S. SPIVEY, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-CR-10056A Honorable Lori A. Crockett, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 4, 2009
DISMISSED
The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that this case “is a plea-bargain case,
and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure provides, “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant
has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(d). On November 24, 2008, we ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to
Rule 25.2(d) unless appellant filed an amended trial court certification showing that he had the 04-08-00830-CR
right of appeal by December 29, 2008. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v.
State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). No such amended trial
court certification has been filed. Therefore, Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this
appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Walter S. Spivey v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-s-spivey-v-state-texapp-2009.