Walter Lee Scott, Jr. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 24, 2016·No. 03-15-00096-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 24, 2016

NO. 03-15-00096-CR

Walter Lee Scott, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment and sentence that

requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to remove the

statement “SEE ATTACHED DISCLOSURE OF PLEA RECOMMENDATIONS” from the line

underneath the heading “Terms of Pleas Bargain” and to instead reflect that the “Terms of Plea

Bargain” are “Not Applicable.” The judgment, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter Lee Scott, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Walter Lee Scott, Jr. v. State (Walter Lee Scott, Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.