Walter Lee Scott, Jr. v. State
This text of Walter Lee Scott, Jr. v. State (Walter Lee Scott, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 24, 2016
NO. 03-15-00096-CR
Walter Lee Scott, Jr., Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s
judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment and sentence that
requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment to remove the
statement “SEE ATTACHED DISCLOSURE OF PLEA RECOMMENDATIONS” from the line
underneath the heading “Terms of Pleas Bargain” and to instead reflect that the “Terms of Plea
Bargain” are “Not Applicable.” The judgment, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is
indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Walter Lee Scott, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-lee-scott-jr-v-state-texapp-2016.