Walter Lee Hall, Jr. v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., Its Successors and Assigns

Court of Appeals of Texas

Walter Lee Hall, Jr. v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., Its Successors and Assigns

DecidedApril 15, 2011

Docket03-10-00120-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Walter Lee Hall, Jr. v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., Its Successors and Assigns (Walter Lee Hall, Jr. v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., Its Successors and Assigns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walter Lee Hall, Jr. v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., Its Successors and Assigns, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00120-CV

Walter Lee Hall, Jr., Appellant

v.

HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., its Successors and Assigns, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-07-010279, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Walter Lee Hall, Jr., filed his notice of appeal on February 12, 2010, and the various parts of the appellate record were filed throughout the year. On December 7, Hall filed a second motion for extension of time to file his brief, asserting that the clerk's record was deficient because it lacked documents related to whether he should be allowed to appeal as an indigent and asking to have the deadline extended for thirty days beyond the date the clerk's record was supplemented. A supplemental clerk's record containing documents related to Hall's status as an indigent was filed on January 24, 2011, and on that same day, we sent Hall notice that the record had been supplemented and that his brief was due no later than February 23, 2011. We cautioned Hall that if his brief was not timely filed, we would dismiss the appeal. To date, Hall has not filed his brief. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

____________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed for Want of Prosection

Filed: April 15, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00120-CV

Walter Lee Hall, Jr., Appellant

v.

HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., its Successors and Assigns, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-07-010279, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Walter Lee Hall, Jr., filed his notice of appeal on February 12, 2010, and the various parts of the appellate record were filed throughout the year. On December 7, Hall filed a second motion for extension of time to file his brief, asserting that the clerk's record was deficient because it lacked documents related to whether he should be allowed to appeal as an indigent and asking to have the deadline extended for thirty days beyond the date the clerk's record was supplemented. A supplemental clerk's record containing documents related to Hall's status as an indigent was filed on January 24, 2011, and on that same day, we sent Hall notice that the record had been supplemented and that his brief was due no later than February 23, 2011. We cautioned Hall that if his brief was not timely filed, we would dismiss the appeal. To date, Hall has not filed his brief. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

____________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed for Want of Prosection

Filed: April 15, 2010

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Walter Lee Hall, Jr. v. HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc., Its Successors and Assigns, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-lee-hall-jr-v-hsbc-mortgage-services-inc-it-texapp-2011.