Walter L. Larsen, Jr. v. Air California
This text of 459 F.2d 52 (Walter L. Larsen, Jr. v. Air California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, a discharged commercial airline copilot, brought action under 50 U. S.C. App. § 459(g) (4), and 50 U.S.C. App. § 459(c) (3) (Veterans’ Re-employment Rights), demanding reinstatement and back pay. He appeals a judgment granting partial back pay but denying reinstatement, 313 F.Supp. 218.
The crucial issue was whether plaintiff lost his job for requesting leave to attend military reserve drills or for unsatisfactory performance as a flight-crew member. The evidence was in sharp conflict on all material issues. The district judge observed the witnesses, heard and weighed the evidence, and made findings of fact adverse to the plaintiff. The record reveals no basis for disturbing those findings. Fed.R. Civ.P. 52(a).
While the trial court found no factual basis for ordering reinstatement, the court did find the defendant employer delinquent under 50 U.S.C. App. § 459 *53 (g) (4) in failing to afford plaintiff a predischarge hearing pursuant to the defendant’s own personnel-policy manual. The court accordingly awarded damages of $2,500 for wages lost during the time necessary for the hearing to which plaintiff was entitled. The defendant has not cross-appealed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 F.2d 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-l-larsen-jr-v-air-california-ca9-1972.