Walter L. Hines v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ('Septa')

Third Circuit

Walter L. Hines v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ('Septa')

61 F.3d 895, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17883, 1995 WL 406963

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 12, 1995

Docket94-1842

StatusPublished

This text of 61 F.3d 895 (Walter L. Hines v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ('Septa')) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walter L. Hines v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ('Septa'), 61 F.3d 895, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17883, 1995 WL 406963 (3d Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

61 F.3d 895

Walter L. Hines
v.
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ('SEPTA')

NO. 94-1842

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

June 12, 1995

Appeal From: E.D.Pa., No. 92-cv-04314,

Weiner, J.

AFFIRMED.

Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

61 F.3d 895

Walter L. Hines
v.
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ('SEPTA')

NO. 94-1842

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

June 12, 1995

Appeal From: E.D.Pa., No. 92-cv-04314,

Weiner, J.

AFFIRMED.

Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 F.3d 895, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17883, 1995 WL 406963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-l-hines-v-southeastern-pennsylvania-transpo-ca3-1995.