Walter L. Boyaki, Ruben P. Hernandez & Miranda & Boyaki v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC D/B/A the O'Quinn Law Firm, and Musslewhite & Associates, P.C.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION Cause Number: 01-12-00984-CV Trial Court Cause Number: 0875827 Style: Walter L. Boyaki, Ruben P. Hernandez & Miranda & Boyaki v John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC d/b/a The O'Quinn Law Firm, and Musslewhite & Associates, P.C. Date motion filed*: June 14, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to Supplement the Record and Allow Rebriefing with Corrected Citations Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Yes
Is appeal accelerated? YES NO
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: Appellant shall immediately order supplemental record(s). Amended appellant's brief containing corrected record cites is due 30 days after the supplemental record is filed with this Court. Amended appellee's brief, if any, is due 30 days after appellant's amended brief is filed. Appellant's amended reply brief, if any, is due 20 days after the amended appellee's brief. Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time
Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other:
Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack Acting individually Acting for the Court
Panel consists of Chief Justice Sherry Radack, and Justices Bland and Huddle
Date: October 1, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walter L. Boyaki, Ruben P. Hernandez & Miranda & Boyaki v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC D/B/A the O'Quinn Law Firm, and Musslewhite & Associates, P.C. (Walter L. Boyaki, Ruben P. Hernandez & Miranda & Boyaki v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC D/B/A the O'Quinn Law Firm, and Musslewhite & Associates, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.