Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc. v. Morris A. Fierberg Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc. v. Morris A. Fierberg Co.

363 A.2d 1118, 169 Conn. 640, 1975 Conn. LEXIS 855

DecidedNovember 25, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 363 A.2d 1118 (Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc. v. Morris A. Fierberg Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc. v. Morris A. Fierberg Co., 363 A.2d 1118, 169 Conn. 640, 1975 Conn. LEXIS 855 (Colo. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court in Hartford County denying the plaintiff’s application to vacate an arbitration award. The sole assignment of error pressed on the appeal is that the court failed to conclude that one of the three arbitrators “evidenced partiality during the hearing held on the defendant’s claim in arbitration against the plaintiff.”

We have examined the record and the transcript of the arbitration proceedings and find no error in the conclusion of the court that there is no substantial basis for the claim of the plaintiff and, accordingly, we find no error in the judgment denying the application to vacate the award.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court in Hartford County denying the plaintiff’s application to vacate an arbitration award. The sole assignment of error pressed on the appeal is that the court failed to conclude that one of the three arbitrators “evidenced partiality during the hearing held on the defendant’s claim in arbitration against the plaintiff.”

We have examined the record and the transcript of the arbitration proceedings and find no error in the conclusion of the court that there is no substantial basis for the claim of the plaintiff and, accordingly, we find no error in the judgment denying the application to vacate the award.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 A.2d 1118, 169 Conn. 640, 1975 Conn. LEXIS 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-kidde-constructors-inc-v-morris-a-fierberg-co-conn-1975.