Walter K. Johnson v. Hardy Green

811 F.2d 606, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34564, 1986 WL 18578
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 8, 1986
Docket86-6165
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 811 F.2d 606 (Walter K. Johnson v. Hardy Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walter K. Johnson v. Hardy Green, 811 F.2d 606, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34564, 1986 WL 18578 (6th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

811 F.2d 606

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Walter K. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Hardy GREEN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 86-6165.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 1986.

Before ENGEL, JONES and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of appellee's motion to dismiss and appellant's response in opposition.

It appears from the record that the final order was entered on September 25, 1986, and the notice of appeal was filed on October 28, one day late. Rules 4(a) and 26(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Neither Rule 6(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nor Rule 26(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, extends the appeals time by three additional days because the order was mailed by the district court clerk. The time for filing a notice of appeal begins to run from date of entry of the judgment, not its receipt. Welsh v. Elevating Boats, Inc., 698 F.2d 230, 232 (5th Cir.1983); Sofarelli Associates, Inc. v. United States, 716 F.2d 1395 (Fed.Cir.1983); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Kurtenbach, 525 F.2d 1179 (8th Cir.1975). Also, mailing of a notice of appeal does not constitute filing. Pryor v. Marshall, 711 F.2d 63 (6th Cir.1983).

The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Rule 4(a) is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this Court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir.1983). Rule 26(b) specifically provides that this Court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be and hereby is granted and the appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ultimate Appliance CC v. Kirby Co.
601 F.3d 414 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
811 F.2d 606, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34564, 1986 WL 18578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-k-johnson-v-hardy-green-ca6-1986.