Walter J Shaw v. Eaton Corporation

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 23, 2011
Docket143346
StatusPublished

This text of Walter J Shaw v. Eaton Corporation (Walter J Shaw v. Eaton Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walter J Shaw v. Eaton Corporation, (Mich. 2011).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

November 23, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

143346 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly WALTER J. SHAW, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 143346 COA: 300389 WCAC: 09-000090 EATON CORPORATION and OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, J. (concurring).

Although I am troubled by the magistrate’s findings, particularly with respect to plaintiff having suffered a mental disability under MCL 418.301(2), given that the only testimony on this point was that plaintiff felt “overwhelmed” and “anxious” due to his employer’s purported lack of concern regarding his complaints that a fellow employee had not been properly trained, and plaintiff’s psychiatrist’s opinion that such feelings prevented plaintiff from holding gainful employment, I nonetheless reluctantly concur with the instant order of denial. For purposes of review in this Court, factual findings by the magistrate and the WCAC are treated as conclusive, in the absence of fraud. Mudel v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, 462 Mich 691, 701 (2000).

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 23, 2011 _________________________________________ t1116 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
614 N.W.2d 607 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Walter J Shaw v. Eaton Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-j-shaw-v-eaton-corporation-mich-2011.