Walter J Shaw v. Eaton Corporation
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
November 23, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
143346 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly
Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway
Mary Beth Kelly
WALTER J. SHAW, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
v SC: 143346 COA: 300389 WCAC: 09-000090
EATON CORPORATION and OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J. (concurring).
Although I am troubled by the magistrate’s findings, particularly with respect to plaintiff having suffered a mental disability under MCL 418.301(2), given that the only testimony on this point was that plaintiff felt “overwhelmed” and “anxious” due to his employer’s purported lack of concern regarding his complaints that a fellow employee had not been properly trained, and plaintiff’s psychiatrist’s opinion that such feelings prevented plaintiff from holding gainful employment, I nonetheless reluctantly concur with the instant order of denial. For purposes of review in this Court, factual findings by the magistrate and the WCAC are treated as conclusive, in the absence of fraud. Mudel v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, 462 Mich 691, 701 (2000).
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
November 23, 2011 _________________________________________ t1116 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walter J Shaw v. Eaton Corporation (Walter J Shaw v. Eaton Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.