Walter Hamilton Sawyers v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Walter Hamilton Sawyers v. United States

212 F.2d 793, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3440

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 14, 1954

Docket12004

StatusPublished

This text of 212 F.2d 793 (Walter Hamilton Sawyers v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walter Hamilton Sawyers v. United States, 212 F.2d 793, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3440 (6th Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record and the briefs of the parties, and it appearing that appellant was convicted by a jury of a violation of Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 2311 et seq., known as the Dyer Act, and there appearing no reversible error in the conduct of the trial or in the verdict of the jury, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record and the briefs of the parties, and it appearing that appellant was convicted by a jury of a violation of Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 2311 et seq., known as the Dyer Act, and there appearing no reversible error in the conduct of the trial or in the verdict of the jury, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 F.2d 793, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-hamilton-sawyers-v-united-states-ca6-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack