Walter Hall v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
286 F.2d 175
Opinion
This appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant in a workmen’s compensation case presents only factual issues. There was undoubtedly ample evidence to the effect that appellant was not disabled prior to his suffering a heart attack to support the judgment of the trial court.
The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walter Hall v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 286 F.2d 175 (5th Cir. 1961).
286 F.2d 175 (Walter Hall v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.