Walter Hall v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
286 F.2d 175
This text of 286 F.2d 175 (Walter Hall v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Walter Hall v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 286 F.2d 175 (5th Cir. 1961).
Opinion
This appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant in a workmen’s compensation case presents only factual issues. There was undoubtedly ample evidence to the effect that appellant was not disabled prior to his suffering a heart attack to support the judgment of the trial court.
The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
286 F.2d 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-hall-v-aetna-casualty-surety-company-ca5-1961.