Walter Forrest Ross v. State
Opinion
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed September 16, 2015.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00608-CR
WALTER FORREST ROSS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15-53396-W
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Fillmore and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Fillmore Walter Forrest Ross pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine in an amount of
one gram or more but less than four grams. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the trial court
sentenced appellant to two years’ imprisonment. Appellant waived his right to appeal as part of
the plea agreement. See Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). The
trial court certified both that appellant waived his right to appeal and that the case involves a plea
bargain and appellant has no right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Dears v. State, 154
S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We deny as moot counsel’s motion to
withdraw that was filed contemporaneously with an Anders brief.
/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47
150608F.U05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
WALTER FORREST ROSS, Appellant On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-15-00608-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F15-53396-W. Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore, Chief THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justice Wright and Justice Stoddart participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered this 16th day of September, 2015.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walter Forrest Ross v. State (Walter Forrest Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.