Walter Ellis Paige v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections, Director Augusta Correctional Center, Warden L.W. Huffman, Yusuf Abdul Al-Wahhab v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections, Director Augusta Correctional Center, Warden L.W. Huffman, Brian Mallory v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections Augusta Correctional Center, Robert S. Hill, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections, Director Augustana Correctional Center, Warden L. W. Huffman

21 F.3d 423, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15863
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1994
Docket93-7299
StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 423 (Walter Ellis Paige v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections, Director Augusta Correctional Center, Warden L.W. Huffman, Yusuf Abdul Al-Wahhab v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections, Director Augusta Correctional Center, Warden L.W. Huffman, Brian Mallory v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections Augusta Correctional Center, Robert S. Hill, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections, Director Augustana Correctional Center, Warden L. W. Huffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walter Ellis Paige v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections, Director Augusta Correctional Center, Warden L.W. Huffman, Yusuf Abdul Al-Wahhab v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections, Director Augusta Correctional Center, Warden L.W. Huffman, Brian Mallory v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections Augusta Correctional Center, Robert S. Hill, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections, Director Augustana Correctional Center, Warden L. W. Huffman, 21 F.3d 423, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15863 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

21 F.3d 423
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Walter Ellis PAIGE, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia; Department of Corrections,
Director; Augusta Correctional Center, Warden;
L.W. Huffman, Defendants Appellee.
Yusuf ABDUL Al-Wahhab, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia; Department of Corrections,
Director; Augusta Correctional Center, Warden;
L.W. Huffman, Defendants Appellees.
Brian MALLORY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia; Department of Corrections;
Augusta Correctional Center, Defendants Appellees.
Robert S. HILL, Jr.,
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia; Department of Corrections,
Director; Augustana Correctional Center, Warden;
L. W. Huffman, Defendants Appellees.

Nos. 93-7299, 93-7300, 93-7301, 93-7311.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 14, 1994.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turj, District Judge. (CA-93-749, CA-93-750, CA-93-753, CA-93-754).

Walter Ellis Paige, Robert S. Hill, Jr., Yusuf Abdul-Al-Wahhab, Brian Mallory, Appellants pro se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's orders dismissing their actions as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988), and denying their Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 motions.* Our review of the records and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Paige v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-93-749 (W.D. Va. Oct. 15, Nov. 3, 1993); Hill v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-93-750 (W.D. Va. Oct. 18, Nov. 3, 1993); Al-Wahhab v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-93-753 (W.D. Va. Oct. 15, Nov. 3, 1993); Mallory v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-93-754 (W.D. Va. Oct. 18, Nov. 2, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We consolidated these cases on appeal

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F.3d 423, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-ellis-paige-v-commonwealth-of-virginia-department-of-corrections-ca4-1994.