Walter E. Craven, Warden, Folsom State Prison v. Billy Norman Grimm
This text of 412 F.2d 230 (Walter E. Craven, Warden, Folsom State Prison v. Billy Norman Grimm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellee is a California state prisoner. After he exhausted his state remedies, he filed a petition for habeas corpus in the District Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2241. An evidentiary hearing was conducted. The district judge resolved the factual inquiry in favor of the appellee, and the state appeals.
We are not persuaded that we should reverse. District Judge Zirpoli carefully explained the basis of his conclusion that the state conviction was grounded upon evidence obtained in a federally impermissible manner. The conclusion is supported by factual determinations and we cannot, on the record, hold that the determinations were clearly erroneous.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
412 F.2d 230, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-e-craven-warden-folsom-state-prison-v-billy-norman-grimm-ca9-1969.