Walter D. Sanders, Trustee in Bankruptcy for the Atlanta Times, Inc., Bankrupt v. National Acceptance Company of America

383 F.2d 606, 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 793
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 2, 1967
Docket24372
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 383 F.2d 606 (Walter D. Sanders, Trustee in Bankruptcy for the Atlanta Times, Inc., Bankrupt v. National Acceptance Company of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walter D. Sanders, Trustee in Bankruptcy for the Atlanta Times, Inc., Bankrupt v. National Acceptance Company of America, 383 F.2d 606, 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 793 (5th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal involves a petition for reclamation of property held by the bankrupt under two agreements. The property has been sold and the parties agree that the funds representing the net recovery from the sale stand in lieu of the property.

The question presented turns on whether the agreements were leases or agreements creating security interests within the meaning of the Uniform Commercial Code as it exists under the Georgia law. Ga.Code § 109A-1-201[37]. That provision of the Code states that whether a lease is intended as security is to be determined by the facts of each case. The agreements here were not perfected as required under Ga.Code § 109A-9-302 (1) in the event they are held to create security interests and the trustee would be entitled to recover with appellee being relegated to the status of an unsecured creditor.

The agreements were called leases. There was no security deposit in connection with either. Neither contained an option to purchase. Appellee retained ownership at all times. There were renewal provisions at stated prices but the evidence was sufficient, based on market value, to support a finding that the prices were substantial as distinguished from a mere nominal price. The record supports the conclusion reached by the Referee and affirmed by the District Court that the agreements were leases and that they did not involve security interests.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
2001 WI App 199 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2001)
Spina v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois, 1998
Steinmetz v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.
963 F. Supp. 1294 (E.D. New York, 1997)
Demitropoulos v. Bank One Milwaukee, N.A.
924 F. Supp. 894 (N.D. Illinois, 1996)
Sharer v. Creative Leasing, Inc.
612 So. 2d 1191 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1993)
Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. United Telephone Co.
39 B.R. 980 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1984)
First National Bank in Grand Prairie v. Lone Star Life Insurance Co.
524 S.W.2d 525 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Capital Typewriter Co. v. Davidson
390 F. Supp. 273 (E.D. Arkansas, 1975)
In Re Shell
390 F. Supp. 273 (E.D. Arkansas, 1975)
Leaseco, Inc. v. Bartlett
257 So. 2d 629 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Transamerica Leasing Corp. v. Bureau of Revenue
450 P.2d 934 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1969)
In Re Wright Homes, Inc.
279 F. Supp. 598 (M.D. North Carolina, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
383 F.2d 606, 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-d-sanders-trustee-in-bankruptcy-for-the-atlanta-times-inc-ca5-1967.