Walter D. Beezer v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation

Third Circuit

Walter D. Beezer v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation

203 F.2d 954, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3453

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 16, 1953·No. 10945_1·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that the judgment of the court below should be reversed, asserting that no actionable negligence was shown on its part which was the proximate cause of the accident, that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, that the evidence as to the impaired physical condition of the plaintiff was insufficient, and that the verdict was excessive. Every contention made is fully answered by the opinion of Judge Stewart. See 107 F.Supp. 361. Since we perceive no error, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that the judgment of the court below should be reversed, asserting that no actionable negligence was shown on its part which was the proximate cause of the accident, that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, that the evidence as to the impaired physical condition of the plaintiff was insufficient, and that the verdict was excessive. Every contention made is fully answered by the opinion of Judge Stewart. See 107 F.Supp. 361. Since we perceive no error, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Walter D. Beezer v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation, 203 F.2d 954, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3453 (3d Cir. 1953).

Pincite

203 F.2d 954 (Walter D. Beezer v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related