Walter D. Beezer v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation
This text of 203 F.2d 954 (Walter D. Beezer v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant contends that the judgment of the court below should be reversed, asserting that no actionable negligence was shown on its part which was the proximate cause of the accident, that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, that the evidence as to the impaired physical condition of the plaintiff was insufficient, and that the verdict was excessive. Every contention made is fully answered by the opinion of Judge Stewart. See 107 F.Supp. 361. Since we perceive no error, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 F.2d 954, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-d-beezer-v-baltimore-ohio-railroad-company-a-corporation-ca3-1953.