Walter Cook, III v. Scott Kernan

976 F.3d 1015
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walter Cook, III v. Scott Kernan. Read the opinion of the Court — 948 F.3d 952
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 28, 2020·No. 17-17257·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WALTER JOSEPH COOK III, No. 17-17257 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-06343- WHA SCOTT KERNAN, Respondent-Appellee. ORDER

Filed September 28, 2020

Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, N. Randy Smith, and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges.

Order 2 COOK V. KERNAN

ORDER

Judge Callahan has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. Judge N.R. Smith has voted to deny Appellant’s petition for rehearing and recommends denying the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Murguia has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f).

The petition for rehearing and for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter Cook, III v. Scott Kernan, 976 F.3d 1015 (9th Cir. 2020).

976 F.3d 1015 (Walter Cook, III v. Scott Kernan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.