Walter Bridges v. Hayden J. Dees, Warden

Fifth Circuit

Walter Bridges v. Hayden J. Dees, Warden

404 F.2d 341, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4674

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 2, 1968

Docket26096_1

StatusPublished

This text of 404 F.2d 341 (Walter Bridges v. Hayden J. Dees, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walter Bridges v. Hayden J. Dees, Warden, 404 F.2d 341, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4674 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus after holding an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

*342 The evidence presented at the hearing fails to support the appellant’s contentions that he was coerced and physically beaten into signing a confession, that he was denied counsel at the time of his arrest and interrogation, and that his guilty plea was not voluntarily entered. The district judge found appellant’s testimony to be untrustworthy, and the transcript and record support this view. The findings and judgment of the district court are not clearly erroneous and are hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the district court’s order denying appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus after holding an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

*342 The evidence presented at the hearing fails to support the appellant’s contentions that he was coerced and physically beaten into signing a confession, that he was denied counsel at the time of his arrest and interrogation, and that his guilty plea was not voluntarily entered. The district judge found appellant’s testimony to be untrustworthy, and the transcript and record support this view. The findings and judgment of the district court are not clearly erroneous and are hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

404 F.2d 341, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-bridges-v-hayden-j-dees-warden-ca5-1968.