Walter Booker v. R. Timmons

698 F. App'x 88
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walter Booker v. R. Timmons. Read the opinion of the Court — 644 F. App'x 219
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 2, 2017·No. 17-6402·Unpublished

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter D. Booker appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint raising claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2012), and state law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Timmons, No. 1:14-cv-00555-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 2014; July 14, 2015; Feb. 14, 2017). We deny the motion for injunctive relief pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and’ argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter Booker v. R. Timmons, 698 F. App'x 88 (4th Cir. 2017).

698 F. App'x 88 (Walter Booker v. R. Timmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related