Walter B. Stevens v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General

257 F.2d 205, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 201, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4473
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided May 22, 1958·No. 14099_1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court, dismissing plain tiff s-appellants’ complaint, which sought to enjoin the Postmaster General from barring from the mails certain envelopes carrying printed matter placed thereon by plaintiffs-appellants. Judge Keech’s memorandum, D.C.D.C.1957, 151 F.Supp. 343, states the facts, and concludes, that the materials inscribed on the envelopes rendered them within the prohibition of 18 U.S.C. § 1718 (1952), which declares nonmailable “matter otherwise mailable by law, upon the envelope * * * of which * * * is * * * printed * * * language * * * calculated by the terms * * * and obviously intended to reflect injuriously upon the character or conduct of another * * *.” On consideration, we discern no basis for disturbing the action of the District Court in dismissing the complaint for equitable relief by way of an injunction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter B. Stevens v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General, 257 F.2d 205, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 201, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4473 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

257 F.2d 205 (Walter B. Stevens v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Handler
383 F. Supp. 1267 (D. Maryland, 1974)
Ray Allen Tollett v. United States
485 F.2d 1087 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)
Tollett v. United States
485 F.2d 1087 (Eighth Circuit, 1973)