Walter B. Stevens v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General
This text of 257 F.2d 205 (Walter B. Stevens v. Arthur E. Summerfield, Postmaster General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court, dismissing plain tiff s-appellants’ complaint, which sought to enjoin the Postmaster General from barring from the mails certain envelopes carrying printed matter placed thereon by plaintiffs-appellants. Judge Keech’s memorandum, D.C.D.C.1957, 151 F.Supp. 343, states the facts, and concludes, that the materials inscribed on the envelopes rendered them within the prohibition of 18 U.S.C. § 1718 (1952), which declares nonmailable “matter otherwise mailable by law, upon the envelope * * * of which * * * is * * * printed * * * language * * * calculated by the terms * * * and obviously intended to reflect injuriously upon the character or conduct of another * * *.” On consideration, we discern no basis for disturbing the action of the District Court in dismissing the complaint for equitable relief by way of an injunction.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 F.2d 205, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 201, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-b-stevens-v-arthur-e-summerfield-postmaster-general-cadc-1958.