Walter A. Robinson, Superintendent of Insurance of Ohio v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company

Sixth Circuit

Walter A. Robinson, Superintendent of Insurance of Ohio v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company

226 F.2d 834

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 11, 1955

Docket12508

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 226 F.2d 834 (Walter A. Robinson, Superintendent of Insurance of Ohio v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walter A. Robinson, Superintendent of Insurance of Ohio v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company, 226 F.2d 834 (6th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming on to be heard upon appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and having been submitted on the record and briefs without argument of counsel;

And it appearing that the order of the District Court herein appealed from was an order of the District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, overruling appellant’s motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum which had been issued in connection with the taking of a deposition in Ohio for use in an action pending in the District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Rule 45(d), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.;

And the Court being of the opinion that such an order is not a final or appeal-able order; Secs. 1291, 1292, Title 28, U.S.Code; Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 60 S.Ct. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783; Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S.Ct. 356, 50 L.Ed. 686; In re Manufacturers’ Trading Corp., 6 Cir., 194 F. 2d 948; National Nut Co. v. Kelling Nut Co., 7 Cir., 134 F.2d 532; Dille v. Carter Oil Co., 10 Cir., 174 F.2d 318; Thomas French & Sons v. International Braid Co., 1 Cir., 146 F.2d 735; Dugan & McNamara Inc. v. Clark, 3 Cir., 170 F.2d 118.

It is ordered that the motion be sustained and the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming on to be heard upon appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and having been submitted on the record and briefs without argument of counsel;

And it appearing that the order of the District Court herein appealed from was an order of the District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, overruling appellant’s motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum which had been issued in connection with the taking of a deposition in Ohio for use in an action pending in the District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Rule 45(d), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.;

And the Court being of the opinion that such an order is not a final or appeal-able order; Secs. 1291, 1292, Title 28, U.S.Code; Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 60 S.Ct. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783; Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S.Ct. 356, 50 L.Ed. 686; In re Manufacturers’ Trading Corp., 6 Cir., 194 F. 2d 948; National Nut Co. v. Kelling Nut Co., 7 Cir., 134 F.2d 532; Dille v. Carter Oil Co., 10 Cir., 174 F.2d 318; Thomas French & Sons v. International Braid Co., 1 Cir., 146 F.2d 735; Dugan & McNamara Inc. v. Clark, 3 Cir., 170 F.2d 118.

It is ordered that the motion be sustained and the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 F.2d 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-a-robinson-superintendent-of-insurance-of-ohio-v-bankers-life-and-ca6-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack