Waltenberg v. Bernhard

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Waltenberg v. Bernhard

27 Misc. 794, 58 N.Y.S. 325

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 Misc. 794 (Waltenberg v. Bernhard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waltenberg v. Bernhard, 27 Misc. 794, 58 N.Y.S. 325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Freedman, P. J.

The appeal of the defendant is from an order of the General Term of the City Court affirming a judgment entered against him upon the verdict of a jury, etc.- The notice of appeal to this court embraces nothing else. The record shows, however, that judgment of affirmance was duly entered upon said order, and that no appeal was taken from such judgment. The appeal from the order should be dismissed, with costs.

MacL-eah and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman, P. J.

The appeal of the defendant is from an order of the General Term of the City Court affirming a judgment entered against him upon the verdict of a jury, etc.- The notice of appeal to this court embraces nothing else. The record shows, however, that judgment of affirmance was duly entered upon said order, and that no appeal was taken from such judgment. The appeal from the order should be dismissed, with costs.

MacL-eah and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with costs to respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Misc. 794, 58 N.Y.S. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waltenberg-v-bernhard-nyappterm-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack