Walt Whitman Game Room Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Huntington

54 A.D.2d 764, 387 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14430
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 25, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 764 (Walt Whitman Game Room Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walt Whitman Game Room Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Huntington, 54 A.D.2d 764, 387 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

In a proceeding to review a determination of the respondent zoning board of appeals, which, after a hearing, denied petitioner’s application for a special exception permit, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 20, 1976, which dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and matter remanded to the zoning board of appeals for further proceedings consistent herewith. The petitioner applied to the respondent zoning board of appeals for a special exception permit to conduct a "place of amusement (game room)”. Of the seven members of the zoning board of appeals, two voted to grant the application, two voted to deny it, two members abstained and one was absent. The application of the provisions of section 41 of the General Construction Law to the action of the zoning board of appeals here sought to be reviewed would require four votes, a majority of the whole number which the board has, to perform or exercise a duty or power. The vote in the instant situation was not a valid action and "was equivalent to nonaction” (see Matter of Squicciarini v Planning Bd. of Town of Chester, 48 AD2d 687, affd 38 NY2d 958). Accordingly, the matter has been remanded to the zoning board of appeals for a vote in accord with section 41 of the General Construction Law (cf. Matter of Gray v Maislen, 17 Mise 2d 161). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

TALL TREES v. Zoning Bd.
761 N.E.2d 565 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
Tall Trees Construction Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
761 N.E.2d 565 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
Tall Trees Construction Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
262 A.D.2d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Hoffis v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Glens Falls
166 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Reiff v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
128 Misc. 2d 851 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)
Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1982

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 764, 387 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walt-whitman-game-room-inc-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-of-huntington-nyappdiv-1976.