Walt Disney World Co. v. Goode

520 So. 2d 270, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 170, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 227, 1988 WL 15120
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 25, 1988·No. No. 70054·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction to review Walt Disney World Co. v. Goode, 501 So.2d 622 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), because of apparent conflict with decisions of other district courts of appeal. Upon closer examination, we find that the alleged conflict cases are distinguishable and we lack jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. OVERTON, J., concurs in result only. McDOÑALD, C.J., dissents.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT. SEE FLA.R.APP.P. 9.330(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walt Disney World Co. v. Goode, 520 So. 2d 270, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 170, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 227, 1988 WL 15120 (Fla. 1988).

520 So. 2d 270 (Walt Disney World Co. v. Goode) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walt Disney World Co. v. Goode
501 So. 2d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)