Walsh v. West Pittston Borough

105 A. 82, 262 Pa. 210, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 622
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 17, 1918
DocketAppeal, No. 61
StatusPublished

This text of 105 A. 82 (Walsh v. West Pittston Borough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walsh v. West Pittston Borough, 105 A. 82, 262 Pa. 210, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 622 (Pa. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The sole complaint of the appellant is of the reference by the trial judge in his charge to the jury to the ulti[211]*211mate liability of the owner of the lot abutting on the alleged defective sidewalk. This reference was uncalled for and may be regarded as out of place: Fleming v. Wilmerding Boro., 223 Pa. 295; but we cannot say it was reversible error in view of the general charge, of which no complaint is made, and of the instruction in that portion of it, which is the subject of the second assignment, that the liability of the property owner was not involved in the case. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fleming v. Wilmerding Borough
72 A. 624 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A. 82, 262 Pa. 210, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-west-pittston-borough-pa-1918.