Walsh v. Warren & Trainer

18 Mo. 157
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 15, 1853·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Gamble, Judge.

The parties in this case, on the trial in the Circuit Court, by agreement of counsel, admitted the evidence on each side to go to the jury, and after the evidence was closed, they agreed upon the law which should be pronounced to t'he jury by the court, in the form of instructions. The plaintiffs became dissatisfied when the verdict was found for the defendants, and moved for a new trial, which the court overruled. As this court does not review the action of the Circuit Court, on a motion for a new trial upon the evidence, and as the parties in this case agreed upon the instructions to be given, as well as the evidence upon which the jury were to pass, there is no point to be decided.

The judgment is affirmed, the other judges concurring-.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walsh v. Warren & Trainer, 18 Mo. 157 (Mo. 1853).

18 Mo. 157 (Walsh v. Warren & Trainer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Long v. Long
44 S.W. 341 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)