Walsh v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walsh v. Walsh

56 A.D.2d 568, 866 N.Y.S.2d 880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 568 (Walsh v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walsh v. Walsh, 56 A.D.2d 568, 866 N.Y.S.2d 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an amended order of the Family Court, Orange County (Woods, J.), dated January 18, 2008, which, upon consent of the parties, inter alia, awarded sole custody of the subject children to the father. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

[569]*569Ordered that assigned counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is dismissed as academic.

The appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order entered on consent of the appellant (see CPLR 5511). Spolzino, J.E, Florio, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an amended order of the Family Court, Orange County (Woods, J.), dated January 18, 2008, which, upon consent of the parties, inter alia, awarded sole custody of the subject children to the father. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

[569]*569Ordered that assigned counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is dismissed as academic.

The appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order entered on consent of the appellant (see CPLR 5511). Spolzino, J.E, Florio, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 568, 866 N.Y.S.2d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-walsh-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack