Walsh v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walsh v. Walsh

251 A.D.2d 338, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6354

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 338 (Walsh v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walsh v. Walsh, 251 A.D.2d 338, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal is from an order of protection of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), entered June 10, 1997, which, inter alia, directed the appellant to refrain from any acts of physical violence directed toward the petitioner until June 10, 2000.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting from the sixth and seventh decretal paragraphs thereof the date “June 10, 2000” and substituting therefor the date “June 10, 1998”; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from fails to set forth, and the record does not support, a finding of aggravating circumstances (cf., Matter of Muller v Muller, 221 AD2d 635, 637). Therefore, the order of protection may be effective for a period not to exceed one year, and we hereby modify it accordingly (see, Family Ct Act §§ 842, 827 [a] [vii]; Matter of Zirkind v Zirkind, 218 AD2d 745, 746). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal is from an order of protection of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), entered June 10, 1997, which, inter alia, directed the appellant to refrain from any acts of physical violence directed toward the petitioner until June 10, 2000.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting from the sixth and seventh decretal paragraphs thereof the date “June 10, 2000” and substituting therefor the date “June 10, 1998”; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from fails to set forth, and the record does not support, a finding of aggravating circumstances (cf., Matter of Muller v Muller, 221 AD2d 635, 637). Therefore, the order of protection may be effective for a period not to exceed one year, and we hereby modify it accordingly (see, Family Ct Act §§ 842, 827 [a] [vii]; Matter of Zirkind v Zirkind, 218 AD2d 745, 746). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 338, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-walsh-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack