Walsh v. Walsh

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Walsh v. Walsh

104 A. 821, 88 N.J. Eq. 368, 3 Stock. 368, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 500

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 19, 1917·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a suit by a wife for maintenance under the statute. The vice-chancellor advised a decree for complainant. The case [370]*370turns on findings of fact alone, and after a full examination of tlie evidence, we conclude that it is adequate to support the de-' cree made, which will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Williams — 10. For affirmance — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a suit by a wife for maintenance under the statute. The vice-chancellor advised a decree for complainant. The case [370]*370turns on findings of fact alone, and after a full examination of tlie evidence, we conclude that it is adequate to support the de-' cree made, which will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Williams — 10. For affirmance — None.

Walsh v. Walsh, 104 A. 821, 88 N.J. Eq. 368, 3 Stock. 368, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 500 (N.J. 1917).

Pincite

104 A. 821 (Walsh v. Walsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related