Walsh v. Timlin

73 N.W. 1003, 98 Wis. 333, 1898 Wisc. LEXIS 129
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 11, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 N.W. 1003 (Walsh v. Timlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walsh v. Timlin, 73 N.W. 1003, 98 Wis. 333, 1898 Wisc. LEXIS 129 (Wis. 1898).

Opinion

MaRshall, J.

Sec. 3781, E: S. 1878, provides that “in actions against a garnishee, the person summoned to answer shall be entitled to receive the same fees for travel and attendance as a witness, and he shall not be bound to appear or answer unless his fees for travel and one day’s attendance shall be first paid,” etc. Sec. 3778, E. S. 1878, in regard to witnesses’ fees in justice court, provides that, “if any witness shall attend upon two or more cases in the same day before the same justice’s court,” he shall receive pay as in one case only, to be apportioned between such cases. Sec. 4067, E. S. 1878, in regard to fees of witnesses in courts of record, provides substantially the same. Such sections must be construed together. Such, it is considered, was the mani[335]*335fest legislative intent. So construed, sec. 3781, R. S. 1878, requires but one attendance fee and one traveling fee to be paid to a person to require him to appear and answer as a garnishee in several cases brought by the same plaintiff against him, returnable at the same time and place before the same justice. That is .in accordance with the decision of the justice in this case, which was reversed by the superior court.

It follows from the foregoing that the question certified by the trial court, on which the decision of this court is required, must be answered in favor of the appellant, and the judgment appealed from reversed.

By the Oowri.— So ordered; and the cause is remanded to the superior court of Douglas county with directions to affirm the judgment of the justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Townsend v. Seelig
88 N.W. 908 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 N.W. 1003, 98 Wis. 333, 1898 Wisc. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-timlin-wis-1898.