Walsh v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walsh v. State

754 So. 2d 742, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 336, 2000 WL 35890

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 19, 2000

DocketNo. 3D99-2913

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 754 So. 2d 742 (Walsh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walsh v. State, 754 So. 2d 742, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 336, 2000 WL 35890 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Daniel F. Walsh appeals an order denying postconviction relief, in which he claims that he does not qualify as a habitual offender because a North Carolina conviction should not have been counted as a predicate offense. A review of this court’s records discloses that this exact claim was rejected by this court in Walsh v. State, 727 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). This court’s earlier ruling is dispositive.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Daniel F. Walsh appeals an order denying postconviction relief, in which he claims that he does not qualify as a habitual offender because a North Carolina conviction should not have been counted as a predicate offense. A review of this court’s records discloses that this exact claim was rejected by this court in Walsh v. State, 727 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). This court’s earlier ruling is dispositive.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

754 So. 2d 742, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 336, 2000 WL 35890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack