Walsh v. State

627 So. 2d 1349, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13217, 1993 WL 538195
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walsh v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 So. 2d 756
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1993·No. No. 92-3630·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. See Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992); Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990). The appellant has also pointed out conflicting orders concerning credit for time served. Upon resentencing, this conflict should be resolved and the trial court should specify the dates of incarceration for which appellant is being credited.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walsh v. State, 627 So. 2d 1349, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13217, 1993 WL 538195 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

627 So. 2d 1349 (Walsh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
598 So. 2d 1063 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Pope v. State
561 So. 2d 554 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)