Walsh v. State

471 So. 2d 1377, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1684, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14887
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 10, 1985
DocketNo. 84-62
StatusPublished

This text of 471 So. 2d 1377 (Walsh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walsh v. State, 471 So. 2d 1377, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1684, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14887 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We have considered each of the issues raised by appellant and find no reversible error. In particular, we find no error in the trial court’s withholding of adjudication and sentence on Count II since the offense charged in Count II was a lesser included offense of Count I and appellant could not properly be adjudicated and sentenced under both counts. See Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983). We construe the court’s order withholding adjudication as simply giving effect to this rule.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. State
437 So. 2d 1057 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 So. 2d 1377, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1684, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.