Walsh v. State
471 So. 2d 1377, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1684, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14887
Opinion
Affirmed. We have considered each of the issues raised by appellant and find no reversible error. In particular, we find no error in the trial court’s withholding of adjudication and sentence on Count II since the offense charged in Count II was a lesser included offense of Count I and appellant could not properly be adjudicated and sentenced under both counts. See Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983). We construe the court’s order withholding adjudication as simply giving effect to this rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walsh v. State, 471 So. 2d 1377, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1684, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14887 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
471 So. 2d 1377 (Walsh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bell v. State
437 So. 2d 1057 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)