Walsh v. New York State Liquor Auth.

209 N.E.2d 821, 16 N.Y.2d 781
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 9, 1965·Published

Opinion

16 N.Y.2d 781 (1965)

Mary E. Walsh, Doing Business as 109 Liquors et al., Individually and on Behalf of Other Licensees Similarly Situated, Appellants,
v.
New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued June 7, 1965.
Decided July 9, 1965.

J. Daniel Mahoney, Robert W. Corcoran, Gerald F. Hoffer

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Philip Weinberg and and William F. Mackey, Jr., for appellants.

Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walsh v. New York State Liquor Auth., 209 N.E.2d 821, 16 N.Y.2d 781 (N.Y. 1965).

209 N.E.2d 821 (Walsh v. New York State Liquor Auth.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walsh v. New York State Liquor Authority
209 N.E.2d 821 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)