Walsh v. New York State Liquor Auth.
209 N.E.2d 821, 16 N.Y.2d 781
This text of 209 N.E.2d 821 (Walsh v. New York State Liquor Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Walsh v. New York State Liquor Auth., 209 N.E.2d 821, 16 N.Y.2d 781 (N.Y. 1965).
Opinion
Mary E. Walsh, Doing Business as 109 Liquors et al., Individually and on Behalf of Other Licensees Similarly Situated, Appellants,
v.
New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
J. Daniel Mahoney, Robert W. Corcoran, Gerald F. Hoffer
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Philip Weinberg and and William F. Mackey, Jr., for appellants.
Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Walsh v. New York State Liquor Authority
209 N.E.2d 821 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
209 N.E.2d 821, 16 N.Y.2d 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-new-york-state-liquor-auth-ny-1965.