Walsh v. Memphis, Carthage & Northwestern R.

6 F. 797, 2 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 156, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2174
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
DecidedMarch 28, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 F. 797 (Walsh v. Memphis, Carthage & Northwestern R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walsh v. Memphis, Carthage & Northwestern R., 6 F. 797, 2 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 156, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2174 (circtedmo 1881).

Opinion

McCRary, C. J.

The corporation defendant is a necessary party to a bill to enforce a judgment against it by compelling contribution from its stockholders. All the stockholders are likewise necessary parties, if they apply to be heard, to the end that each may be assessed his equitable share only. Hence it is that in this case the controversy is not wholly between citizens of different states, and cannot be finally determined as between them.

Motion to remand sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Continental Adjustment Co. v. Cook
152 F. 652 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin, 1906)
Gianella v. Bigelow
71 N.W. 111 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1897)
Paget v. Stevens
28 N.Y.S. 549 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 F. 797, 2 McCrary's Cir. Ct. Rpts 156, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-memphis-carthage-northwestern-r-circtedmo-1881.