Walsh v. Macomber
119 Mass. 73, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 65
Opinion
The deed to the plaintiff was an execution of the power in the mortgage, and passed all the mortgagee’s title under the mortgage, as well as the mortgagor’s equity of redemption. Brown v. Smith, 116 Mass. 108. Torrey v. Cook 116 Mass. 163, Hall v. Bliss, 118 Mass. 554. But it did not convey the [77] independent right which had been reserved to the mortgagee aa grantor in the original deed to the mortgagor.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walsh v. Macomber, 119 Mass. 73, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 65 (Mass. 1875).
119 Mass. 73 (Walsh v. Macomber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. English Construction Co.
20 N.E.2d 939 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
City of Rockland v. Farnsworth
44 A. 681 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1899)