Walsh v. LaGuardia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walsh v. LaGuardia

245 A.D. 835

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying appEcation for peremptory order of mandamus reversed on the law and not in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and motion granted, with ten doEars costs and disbursements. The operation of the injunction wiE be stayed for a reasonable time to be fixed in the order. The operation of buses is illegal unless a franchise has been granted by the public authorities. (Huff v. Tri-Boro Coach Corp., N. Y. L. J. September 29, 1934; Bogart v. Walker, 231 App. Div. 499.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appEcation for peremptory order of mandamus reversed on the law and not in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and motion granted, with ten doEars costs and disbursements. The operation of the injunction wiE be stayed for a reasonable time to be fixed in the order. The operation of buses is illegal unless a franchise has been granted by the public authorities. (Huff v. Tri-Boro Coach Corp., N. Y. L. J. September 29, 1934; Bogart v. Walker, 231 App. Div. 499.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting. Settle order on notice.

Walsh v. LaGuardia, 245 A.D. 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

245 A.D. 835 (Walsh v. LaGuardia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related