Walsh v. LaGuardia
This text of 245 A.D. 835 (Walsh v. LaGuardia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying appEcation for peremptory order of mandamus reversed on the law and not in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and motion granted, with ten doEars costs and disbursements. The operation of the injunction wiE be stayed for a reasonable time to be fixed in the order. The operation of buses is illegal unless a franchise has been granted by the public authorities. (Huff v. Tri-Boro Coach Corp., N. Y. L. J. September 29, 1934; Bogart v. Walker, 231 App. Div. 499.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D. 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-laguardia-nyappdiv-1935.