Walsh v. Kelly

New York Court of Appeals

Walsh v. Kelly

406 N.E.2d 741, 49 N.Y.2d 959, 428 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2315

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 24, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 406 N.E.2d 741 (Walsh v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walsh v. Kelly, 406 N.E.2d 741, 49 N.Y.2d 959, 428 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2315 (N.Y. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In the contract of sale, the seller agreed that the sale was conditional on the purchaser’s obtaining an FHA mortgage loan covering the premises. In the absence of any express provision to the contrary, the seller must be deemed to have agreed, as one aspect of her implied obligation not to interfere with or to prevent performance by the purchaser of the condition specified in the contract, to perform the obligations imposed by the lending bank with respect to payment of "points” to the extent that the applicable FHA regulation prohibited the payment of "points” by the purchaser.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In the contract of sale, the seller agreed that the sale was conditional on the purchaser’s obtaining an FHA mortgage loan covering the premises. In the absence of any express provision to the contrary, the seller must be deemed to have agreed, as one aspect of her implied obligation not to interfere with or to prevent performance by the purchaser of the condition specified in the contract, to perform the obligations imposed by the lending bank with respect to payment of "points” to the extent that the applicable FHA regulation prohibited the payment of "points” by the purchaser.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

406 N.E.2d 741, 49 N.Y.2d 959, 428 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-kelly-ny-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack