Walsh v. Industrial Commission

491 P.2d 856, 16 Ariz. App. 133, 1971 Ariz. App. LEXIS 886
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona
DecidedDecember 20, 1971
DocketNo. 1 CA-IC 683
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 491 P.2d 856 (Walsh v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walsh v. Industrial Commission, 491 P.2d 856, 16 Ariz. App. 133, 1971 Ariz. App. LEXIS 886 (Ark. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

STEVENS, Presiding Judge.

This case is before the Court by writ of certiorari to review the lawfulness of an award and findings of The Industrial Commission of Arizona issued on 10 June 1971, affirming a previous award of 9 April 1971, finding that the Commission did not have jurisdiction due to the petitioner’s failure to timely request a hearing following the denial of a claim by notice of claim status dated 2 April 1970.

The petitioner filed a workman’s report of injury on 4 February 1970. On 2 April 1970 the carrier issued a notice of claim status, advising petitioner that his claim had been denied. The printed form carried the following caveat:

“NOTICE TO CLAIMANT:

If you are aggrieved by this notice you may apply for a hearing by filing a written application at any office of the Industrial Commission of Arizona within sixty (60) days after the date of mailing of this notice.”

The notice was mailed the same date.

The petitioner filed a petition for hearing on 25 June 1970. The petition was not timely. Parsons v. Industrial Commission, 14 Ariz.App. 218, 482 P.2d 467 (1971).1 See also Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin v. Industrial Commission, 15 Ariz.App. 590, 490 P.2d 35 (1971).

Notwithstanding the jurisdictional question, hearings were conducted. The Fund’s brief urges not only the jurisdictional question but also urges that the award of noncompensability is supportd by the evidence. We too have reviewed the evidence and we agree with the Fund.

The award of the Commission is affirmed.

CASE and DONOFRIO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Trull
520 P.2d 1188 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1974)
Trull v. Industrial Commission
520 P.2d 1188 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1974)
Saline v. Industrial Commission
492 P.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
491 P.2d 856, 16 Ariz. App. 133, 1971 Ariz. App. LEXIS 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-industrial-commission-arizctapp-1971.