Walsh v. Hill

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Walsh v. Hill

236 A.2d 604, 50 N.J. 523, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 192

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedDecember 18, 1967

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 236 A.2d 604 (Walsh v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walsh v. Hill, 236 A.2d 604, 50 N.J. 523, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 192 (N.J. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

In this automobile negligence case the Appellate Division disagreed as to whether a portion of the trial judge’s charge to the jury was prejudicially erroneous. The majority found no such error.

In reviewing the matter we have examined the criticized portion in the context of the entire charge. When so viewed, [524]*524and even though the challenged language is not as clear as it might have been, we cannot say that legal error appears.

Accordingly the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 6.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI